http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/52997| Arquivo | Descrição | Tamanho | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARTIGO_GenerativeArtificialIntelligence.pdf | 220,91 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
| Título: | Generative artificial intelligence and the risk of technodigital colonialism |
| Autor(es): | Corrêa, Leonardo Cambraia Pyrrho, Monique |
| Afiliação do autor: | University of Brasilia, Bioethics Graduate Program University of Brasilia, Bioethics Graduate Program |
| Assunto: | Inteligência artificial Inteligência artificial generativa Ética digital Decolonialidade Plágio |
| Data de publicação: | 2-jul-2025 |
| Editora: | Frontiers |
| Referência: | CAMBRAIA, Leonardo; PYRRHO, Monique. Generative artificial intelligence and the risk of technodigital colonialism. Frontiers in Political Science, v. 7, 1628139, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1628139. Disponível em: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/political-science/articles/10.3389/fpos.2025.1628139/full. Acesso em: 11 nov. 2025. |
| Abstract: | The use of Generative Artificial Intelligence has raised concerns related to plagiarism in scientific contexts. However, bad academic writing is far from being the main ethical challenge related to digital transformations in knowledge production. Additionally, science is not the only trust discourse affected, as journalism and law are deeply impacted in its social roles by the dissemination of artificially generated discourses. Power and knowledge are increasingly imbricated in digital society in a global context where colonial hierarchization, dehumanization and exploitation strategies are still in place. In response to the insufficiency of highlevel moral principles before the ethical and Human Rights challenges brought by GenAI applications, this paper offers an alternative theoretical approach to digital ethics presented in the “decolonizing ethical thinking” section. The aim is to focus on the role that the new epistemic dynamics play to the risk of technodigital colonialism. Decoloniality readings should account for why the benefits and risks are not universally distributed and therefore may help ethical responses be more attentive to the connections between knowledge and power. |
| Unidade Acadêmica: | Instituto de Ciências Biológicas (IB) Departamento de Botânica (IB BOT) Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde (FS) |
| Programa de pós-graduação: | Programa de Pós-Graduação em Bioética |
| Licença: | This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1628139 |
| Aparece nas coleções: | Artigos publicados em periódicos e afins |
Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.