Skip navigation
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/46240
Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
2022_JessicaEloísadeOliveira.pdf1,79 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
Título: As estratégias e os recursos políticos utilizados pelas coalizões de defesa na política nacional de biodiversidade e florestas entre 2012 e 2021
Autor(es): Oliveira, Jessica Eloísa de
E-mail do autor: jessicaeloisa1@gmail.com
Orientador(es): Vieira, Diego Mota
Assunto: Política ambiental
Agenda verde
Stakeholders
Política de biodiversidade
Data de publicação: 4-Ago-2023
Referência: OLIVEIRA, Jessica Eloísa de. As estratégias e os recursos políticos utilizados pelas coalizões de defesa na política nacional de biodiversidade e florestas entre 2012 e 2021. 2022. 168 f., il. Tese (Doutorado em Administração) — Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, 2022.
Abstract: The objective of this thesis is to analyze how mobilization strategies and exploration of resources performed by advocacy coalitions and its stakeholders affected the political process of the national green agenda subsystem in the period between 2012 and 2021. In order to achieve this objective, a qualitative research has been carried out, whose investigation strategy was the case study of Brazilian green agenda subsystem, which includes flora and fauna protection and biodiversity conservation. The data were collected by means of documents and in-depth, semi-structured interviews. In total, 41 stenographic reports from public hearings of National Congress between 2012 and 2021 were coded and analyzed, in addition to general reports, media articles, laws, regulatory decrees, ordinances, draft bills and their remarks regarding the green agenda. The interviews were carried out with 17 key players from the Brazilian green agenda subsystem. The data were analyzed via content analysis. The theoretical models that supported the study were the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) and stakeholders analysis. The results depicts that 143 organizational stakeholders actively participated of the political process of the subsystem, the majority classified as discretionary stakeholders, behaving as contributors and legitimaters. Definitive stakeholders are the most influential under the subsystem and act as agenda setters, as regulators and/or as controllers. The four subsystem’s defense advocacy coalitions – enlightened technocrats, social environmentalists, modern developmental actors, traditional developmental actors – dispute these stakeholders. The coalitions with the most definitive stakeholders achieved dominion under the subsystem. In phase 1 (Dilma administration), the subsystem dominion was divided between social environmentalists and modern developmental actors. In phase 2 (Michel Temer administration), the modern developmental actors took control. In phase 3 (Jair Bolsonaro administration), the traditional developmental actors were the dominant advocacy coalition. Formal legal authority was identified as the most important resource of the subsystem. The coalitions mobilized the remained subsystem’s resources in order to influence the stakeholders that possessed formal legal authority. All resources proposed in the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) literacy were used by advocacy coalitions and three new were identified on research: judicialization, media and international community support. Different strategies were applied by advocacy coalitions of the subsystem to influence the political process by means of resources. Political resources were mobilized collectively by coalitions, usually to access a resource, the use of others resources in the subsystem were necessary.
Unidade Acadêmica: Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Gestão de Políticas Públicas (FACE)
Departamento de Administração (FACE ADM)
Informações adicionais: Tese (doutorado) — Universidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade e Gestão Pública, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração, 2022.
Programa de pós-graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração
Agência financiadora: Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).
Aparece nas coleções:Teses, dissertações e produtos pós-doutorado

Mostrar registro completo do item Visualizar estatísticas



Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.