Título:	Entre máquinas administrativas e governos inteligentes : uma crítica da racionalidade no direito administrativo e uma proposta para os desafios do século XXI
Autor(es):	Teixeira, Victor Epitácio Cravo
Orientador(es):	Castro, Marcus Faro de
Assunto:	Direito administrativo Racionalidade Expertise Regulação algorítmica Democracia Técnica extrajurídica Ponderação de princípios Política pública
Data de publicação:	8-Jul-2020
Data de defesa:	19-Mar-2020
Referência:	TEIXEIRA, Victor Epitácio Cravo. Entre máquinas administrativas e governos inteligentes: uma crítica da racionalidade no direito administrativo e uma proposta para os desafios do século XXI. 2020. 232 f., il. Tese (Doutorado em Direito)—Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, 2020.
Abstract:	The present work identifies two typical attitudes that have characterized how jurists connect the law with nonlegal technical or expert knowledge: (i) either the jurist refuses to analyze the technical grounds of public policies and subordinates the law to nonlegal expertise; or (ii) the jurist considers the structural elements of nonlegal technical discourse, usually in order to modify or replace elements constitutive of public policies, thereby subjugating nonlegal expertise to the law, often by means of a “balancing test” involving the consideration of legal principles. Yet both attitudes are unserviceable if one considers the need of current legal analysis to build intellectual connections that may be useful in policy reform efforts or in enhancing the democratic character of such reforms. This perception raises further concerns in the context of growing automation of administrative decision-making stemming from the use of algorithms that carry a built-in technocratic vision of the life-world. Taking these perceptions as starting points, the present research has explored the need of current legal thought to elaborate a style of legal rationality capable of freeing administrative law from its dogmatic, formalistic subordination to nonlegal expertise, while at the same time avoiding the pitfall of self- determining, warped solutions derived from principles-based balancing tests. The thought of Michel Foucault, and especially his ideas concerning power, were used as guides to the analyses elaborated in the thesis. Special consideration was given to the importance of historical investigations bearing on the development “political technologies”, including their frequent mechanical analogies – themselves harking back to ancient institutional and historical processes – as a way of understanding institutional continuities and fractures that have formed contemporary administrative law. Such approach was also able to shed light on how current doctrines of administrative law cling to formalism derived from conceptualist jurisprudence, leading to legal casuistry grounded on substantive rationality which either uncritically, and by means of legal dogmatics, embody allegedly technical and scientific formulations proposed by bureaucrats working in so-called technical areas; or substitute seemingly self-sufficient balancing tests for the technical opinion of experts. Having recognized the need to build connections between the law and nonlegal expert knowledge, this thesis offers ideas from which a new style of rationality for administrative law can be conceived. The proposed new style of rationality relies on two pillars: (i) the problematizing analysis of expert knowledge built into policies; and (ii) rendering democratic such problematizing analytical move. In proposing this new “democracy- enhancing problematizing legal analysis”, the present thesis intends to offer new conceptual bases both for the characterization of the relations between administrative law and the validity of policies and for the task of reimagining the role that legal analysis must have with regard to the relations between democracy and operation of the state apparatus.
Informações adicionais:	Tese (doutorado)—Universidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Direito, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito, 2020.
Programa de pós-graduação:	Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito
Licença:	A concessão da licença deste item refere-se ao termo de autorização impresso assinado pelo autor com as seguintes condições: Na qualidade de titular dos direitos de autor da publicação, autorizo a Universidade de Brasília e o IBICT a disponibilizar por meio dos sites www.bce.unb.br, www.ibict.br, http://hercules.vtls.com/cgi-bin/ndltd/chameleon?lng=pt&skin=ndltd sem ressarcimento dos direitos autorais, de acordo com a Lei nº 9610/98, o texto integral da obra disponibilizada, conforme permissões assinaladas, para fins de leitura, impressão e/ou download, a título de divulgação da produção científica brasileira, a partir desta data.
Aparece nas coleções:	Teses, dissertações e produtos pós-doutorado

Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.