Title:	Estratégias de desenvolvimento e política industrial de petróleo e gás : uma comparação entre Brasil, México e Noruega Estratégias de desenvolvimento e política industrial de petróleo e gás : uma comparação entre Brasil, México e Noruega
Authors:	Ebling, Maurício
Orientador(es)::	Oliveira, Luiz Guilherme de
Assunto::	Política industrial Petróleo - Brasil Gás natural
Issue Date:	28-Jan-2017
Data de defesa::	30-Sep-2016
Citation:	EBLING, Maurício. Estratégias de desenvolvimento e política industrial de petróleo e gás: uma comparação entre Brasil, México e Noruega. 2016. 410 f., il. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências Sociais) — Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, 2016.
Abstract:	This research aims to answer the question of what serve as a basis for the definition of the industrial policy for the oil and gas sector in Brazil, Mexico and Norway. It will test the hypothesis that the industrial policy for oil and gas in these three countries is defined based on the development strategy adopted by each government. According to the theoretical framework analysed, there is a polarization between two political economic paradigms, which highlight the role of the state, or the role of the market for a country’s development. Literature on industrial policy seems to follow the same division, highlighting the need for state intervention, or the need for market liberalization for the development of a country's industry. Thus, governments with development strategies based on the state’s role would be related to the adoption of interventionist industrial policies, using tools such as market closing, state-owned companies, adoption of a sharing model for production, and nationalization policies for the supply chain, such as local content requirements. Governments with market-based development strategies would be related to the adoption of liberalizing industrial policies, using tools such as market opening, privatization of state-owned companies, adoption of a concession model, and internationalization policies, adopting a global production chain. Theory also offers some models that seek for distinguish from this polarization. While new developmentalism seeks to combine the importance of these two roles, ECLAC’s structuralism highlights the relationship between structure and environment and the literature on industrial policy tries to align the use of protectionist and liberalizing instruments. Other authors use an evolutionary economic perspective to analyse the differences between economic cycles, between industry sectors and between developed and developing countries. All these variations appear to contradict the exclusionary polarization between state and market, pointing to the need for mechanisms that allow a more agile and flexible definition of each industrial policy. It is also used a literature on systemic analysis and on policy monitoring and evaluation mechanisms as an alternative to this polarized view between only two possible types of industrial policy. To test the hypothesis and try to answer the research question, analyses are performed on the history of each country's industry, trying to find correlations between the development strategies adopted by the Brazilian, Mexican and Norwegian governments and the industrial policy instruments adopted by them, that could indicate the occurrence of a pattern over time. In-depth interviews were conducted with representatives from the government and the business associations from the oil and gas industry of the three countries, to try to deepen the understanding of how it is made the definition of the industrial policy of each country. For the data analysis, first it presents a data systematization within each group of actors. Then, this information is crossed, in order to compare the answers given by the government and the associations in each country. Finally, the comparison between the three case studies is made, indicating how the experience of each country can contribute to the reality of other countries analysed.
metadata.dc.description.unidade:	Instituto de Ciências Sociais (ICS) Departamento de Estudos Latino-americanos (ICS ELA)
Description:	Tese (doutorado) — Universidade de Brasília, Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Centro de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação sobre as Américas, 2016.
metadata.dc.description.ppg:	Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais - Estudos Comparados sobre as Américas
Licença::	A concessão da licença deste item refere-se ao termo de autorização impresso assinado pelo autor com as seguintes condições: Na qualidade de titular dos direitos de autor da publicação, autorizo a Universidade de Brasília e o IBICT a disponibilizar por meio dos sites www.bce.unb.br, www.ibict.br, http://hercules.vtls.com/cgi-bin/ndltd/chameleon?lng=pt&skin=ndltd sem ressarcimento dos direitos autorais, de acordo com a Lei nº 9610/98, o texto integral da obra disponibilizada, conforme permissões assinaladas, para fins de leitura, impressão e/ou download, a título de divulgação da produção científica brasileira, a partir desta data.
DOI:	http://dx.doi.org/10.26512/2016.09.T.22287
Appears in Collections:	Teses, dissertações e produtos pós-doutorado

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.